patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Easton Avenue Red Light Camera Results Released

A study released by the DOT shows the results of one year of a red-light camera in use at Easton Avenue and Park Boulevard.

 

A study released by the state shows mixed results at a New Brunswick intersection where a camera has been in place for over a year.

According to the New Jersey Department of Transportation, New Brunswick has one red light camera installed, located at the intersection of Easton Avenue and Park Boulevard. This intersection is the turn to access the emergency room of Saint Peter's University Hospital from Easton Avenue.

According to the report, in the year prior to the installation of the cameras, a total of seven accidents - two right angle crashes and five same direction crashes -  were reported at the intersection, at a total cost of $51,800.

In the year following the installation, same direction crashes decreased, dropping from five to one, and right angle crashes increased from two to three.

Accident costs following the camera installation totaled $86,900, according to the report.

By comparison, at the intersection of Easton Avenue and Albany Street, where a camera is not present, four right angle crashes were recorded in the year prior to the installation of the red light camera program, and three were noted in the year following.

At that same intersection, 11 same direction crashes were noted in the year prior, and eight in the year following.

Cpt. J.T. Miller of New Brunswick Police Department said the camera program is too limited in New Brunswick to make any decisions on how effective it has been.

"In the report for New Brunswick (you're) talking a difference of one accident," he said. "That's a 33 percent increase (but only) one accident."

The state report suggests the same for the program statewide, and recommends continued use and monitoring of the cameras.

New Brunswick has done research of other intersections to see where cameras could possibly be used, Miller said. He declined to disclose where those other intersections in New Brunswick are.

According to a report by NJ.com, the study shows that an overall increase in accidents was observed at two dozen intersections throughout New Jersey where the cameras are located.

The total number of crashes statewide increased from 577 the year before the cameras went up to 582 the year after, according to NJ.com.

That small increase brought with it a $1.2 million increase in "crash severity cost" which looks at multiple bills resulting from crashes, including property damage and emergency response, according to the news agency.

The 24 intersections observed had at least one year of data as of Dec. 31, 2011. Since that time, the number of intersections in New Jersey with red light cameras has risen to 85, according to NJ.com.

  • What do you think of red light cameras?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • They are effective and a good idea
        2 (66%)
    • They are not effective, and cause more accidents then they prevent
        1 (33%)
    • I'd like to see wider use of them in town so we can get more information
        0 (0%)
    • I don't know enough about them to make a decision.
        0 (0%)
    Total votes: 3
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Red Light Camera and nj dot

Amy Braunstein

1:33 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012

There is no information on how many tickets were wrongly issued to people who stopped at the light? That is one of the leading complaints against these cameras and i know more than one ticket has been issued in error.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Jennifer Bradshaw

2:57 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012

Amy, citation totals are listed in the technical appendix included in a pdf above, but it does not break down which were dismissed.

Joe

5:46 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012

The problem with measuring the effectiveness of these cameras solely through collision statistics is that it takes two cars for a collision - for the "right angle" collision you need the person who runs the light *and* the person who's gunning for the green. For this intersection in particular, most people coming from Park know to not anticipate the green but to wait a beat for the idiots to run the light - whether the camera is there or not. So I wouldn't expect to see a significant decrease in right-angle collisions. And I would expect an increase in the same-direction collisions, as the 1st person to the intersection stops for the yellow, because of the camera, while the person behind tries to make the light.

But as a pedestrian who walks through this intersection every day, I've witnessed a profound decrease in the number of people who run the light since the camera was installed (I'm guessing I'm in the background of many of the pictures, I always try to smile). The camera, along with the speed signal, has made Easton Avenue a much safer street to cross, and I think they are well worth the money.

Reply

Donny

10:05 am on Saturday, December 1, 2012

51800 before,86900 after installation .it costs more now .Explain the benefit.Duh !!!!

Reply

MER

8:29 pm on Monday, March 25, 2013

Let's be honest, red light cameras are about all generating revenue:

"New Brunswick, averages about 1,300 summonses a month. Its chief financial officer said the city has earned $312,193 since the start. Between September and May, New Jersey received $106,927 and the county got $255,695 between September 2010 and May."

Reply

Leave a comment