.
Feedback

Federal Contraceptives Rule: What Do You Think?

New Jersey Catholic leaders are calling for parishioners to fight an Obama administration ruling that employers must provide health insurance that includes birth control.

The Catholic church’s New Jersey hierarchy has weighed in on the controversy surrounding the federal requirement that religious schools and hospitals cover contraceptives as part of their health insurance plans.

Church leaders say the requirement violates the religious freedom of Catholics and others that oppose birth control and put employees of religious institutions at risk of losing their health coverage.

"It’s a very serious matter," Newark Archbishop John J. Myers told NJ.com. "The bishops and leadership of the church are very concerned about this, as are many people of the Catholic Church. It’s a real violation of the First Amendment."

Bishop Paul G. Bootoski, of the Diocese of Metuchen, which oversees churches throughout Middlesex County, echoed Myers’ opinion in a statement on the Diocese’s Web site. He said the ruling by the federal Department of Health and Human Services, “threatens to destroy our American and religious tradition of freedom of conscience.“

This decision chillingly takes the First Amendment’s guarantees of religious freedom, intended to prevent government compulsion in matters of conscience, and ironically turns them into weapons threatening to destroy that very freedom. Secretary Sebelius and the Obama Administration have promulgated new rules which will require either that all religious institutions pay for insurance coverage for employee abortions, sterilizations, and contraception, or serve only those of their own religious denominations. The Obama Administration’s plan would drive all institutions maintained by people of conscience out of the health care, social service, and educational arenas. Can this possibly be in the best interests of our nation? Is this really the way that you want your social services provided? Such a plan would require Catholic hospitals, schools, and the like either to violate their consciences or to hire only Catholics, admit only Catholic patients, educate only Catholic children, and so on. This unbridled assault on the freedom of conscience must be stopped.

This decision of the Obama Administration also once again threatens to impose upon all Americans the anti-life agenda which classifies pregnancy as a disease and abortion as a legitimate cure for that disease. If Catholic and other conscience based institutions and individuals are sidelined by this political maneuver, who will be left standing to herald the message that women and their unborn children are to be cherished and cared for? Who will be left to care for those undergoing difficult pregnancies, those seeking to provide the best possible health care to children in distress, both the born and the unborn? Who will be left to advocate for the rights of women and men seeking to love and care for their child as a precious blessing; the anti-life community considers the destruction of such a child as just another choice—do you really want to leave the fate of your children alone in their hands?

Bishop David McConnell of the Trenton Diocese, which covers Mercer and Monmouth County churches, called it “an alarming matter that negatively impacts the Catholic Church in the United States directly, and that strikes at the fundamental right to religious liberty for all citizens of any faith.”

We cannot—we will not—comply with this unjust law.  People of faith cannot be made second class citizens.  We are already joined by our brothers and sisters of all faiths and many others of good will in this important effort to regain our religious freedom. In generations past, the Church has always been able to count on the faithful to stand up and protect her sacred rights and duties.  I hope and trust she can count on this generation of Catholics to do the same.  Our children and grandchildren deserve nothing less.

This is not an attempt by the Church to interfere with anyone’s politics.  It is, rather, an attempt to lift up and live our Catholic faith the way that our nation and our constitution have always guaranteed us the freedom and the right to do.  Please join me and all of those harmed by this legislation in prayer and in an all-out effort to have our freedom restored.  History cautions us repeatedly that once we walk down such a dangerous path, we will get lost in the process.

Surveys of practicing Catholics, according to NJ.com, show that “98 percent of all Catholic women who have been sexually active have used birth control” and “58 percent of American Catholics ‘believe that employers should be required to provide their employees with health care plans that cover contraception.’"

"The loudest voices in the Catholic community are those of the priests and bishops who know they are being ignored when it comes to their teachings on family planning," John O’Brien of Catholics for Choice told NJ.com.

"They may be the loudest, but we know they also represent a tiny minority of Catholics.”

What do you think?

Jim Tobias February 9, 2012 at 08:09 pm
Tempest in a teapot. The hierarchy can't get anyone to obey them on birth control, so they want government to enforce it. No religious freedom is being violated -- this isn't about churches, it's about schools, hospitals, etc. that serve the general public. They need to be treated the same as any other public institutions. 58% of Catholics agree, and a higher percentage of others.
Cathleen DiBenedetto February 9, 2012 at 09:43 pm
I am a Catholic and I do not agree.... People do not have to work for a Catholic schools,hospitals, etc. You take the job and you know what your health insurance plan will be. If you don't like it, you can get a job in another place that has what you want...People do not have to use Catholic schools ,hospitals, etc. You can chose a place that is not Catholic....
Curtis February 9, 2012 at 10:57 pm
We're all trying to achieve universal healthcare. In order to achieve it, we have to define what it is. It is not universal healthcare if each employer gets to pick and choose what to cover. If an employer doesn't want to provide healthcare, then don't provide it. If they do want to provide it, they have to provide the same as everyone else. That is what "universal" means.
Edward Van Embden (Editor) February 9, 2012 at 11:55 pm
If Catholic schools and hospitals didn't accept federal funds they might have a point but until they refuse to accept a single tax cent, they don't.
Frank Burns February 10, 2012 at 12:14 am
My own religious conviction is that God punishes us with disease and rewards us with good health, and that it is a sin to ever try to intervene in his will medically.
I'm therefore stripping practically everything out of my employees' policies. If I can't, I won't be able to sleep nights, because I would have a guilty conscience imagining to what unnatural ends they might choose to apply their insurance, and of course I can't be stopped from stripping out those policies, because my Republican friends are backing me on this, since it is a matter of my own religious freedom. Plus, I save a lot on the health premiums I pay to cover my work force, since their pay package basically only includes chiropractic care and homeopathy, which don't offend my religious scruples because I deem them entirely ineffective.
Chica2ool February 10, 2012 at 12:55 am
98% of catholics practice some form of birth control and have been for decades. Go to any catholic church on any given Sunday and you'll see families have one, maybe two children. So this is not an issue for the catholic voter. Not to mention that catholics are leaving the Church in droves. Hence, the massive closing of catholic schools and churches nationwide.
Eyeballs February 10, 2012 at 01:02 am
It is about religious freedom, even if you're not smart enough to understand the issues. Perhaps the Catholic Church should shut it's schools and hospitals so YOU can pay for the services they've provided. Numbskulls like you only understand when it affects your wallet; theological questions escape your intellect.
Elaine Larson February 10, 2012 at 01:04 am
It is quite simply a violation of the U.S. constitution. It does not matter whether you agree with the church's stance on birth control and it doesn't matter if you want universal health care. You cannot require the Church to pay for something which goes against the tenants of their religion. Obama was supposedly a professor of constitutional law at one time but he seems to have forgotten the course material.
Eyeballs February 10, 2012 at 01:05 am
Thanks for your insights. It's obvious you're a theologian.
Eyeballs February 10, 2012 at 01:07 am
No, we're not all trying to achive universal healthcare. Some of us reject socialism. Don't assume everyone is as stupid and lazy as you.
Sean Tully February 10, 2012 at 01:17 am
And what if they decide to not cover yearly physical exams? Then another company stops covering physical exams. Before long no company covers phyiscal exams. That is why this is called a form of universal healthcare. It means some thing will be covered no matter what company you work for or where you buy your healthcare. The Catholic Church has to realize that their religion is their church and those serving the church as priests, nuns, etc. Their schools, hospitals, etc., are businessess. And I too am Catholic.
Sean Tully February 10, 2012 at 01:18 am
I want to start a religion that requires smoking pot. Can the government stop my flock from firing up?
Truthteller February 10, 2012 at 02:05 am
First the poll question should be worded better.. It is not a case of whether you believe that people deserve the coverage. It is a question of whether you believe a religious organization should be forced to pay the coverage. It is clearly a violation of the religious freedom. It is not a case of women rights or whether or not you agree with birth control. It is also not a matter of how many catholics practice birth control. It is simply a case of can the goverment force a religious organization to pay for coverage it deems immoral. There has always been a clause to allow these orgainizations an exemption. Also many Rabbi's, Baptist ministers and even liberal professors have told the administriation they are on the wrong side of this. Be careful with this issue there are a number of freedoms we enjoy that the govermnet both Dem and Rep will take away to serve their ideology.
Truthteller February 10, 2012 at 02:16 am
Actually Sean there are several religions that have been recognized by the federal government to use drugs. For example there is a group of Native Americans that are allowed to use peyote. Imagine that if you could demonstrate that your religion is not a hoax but a true faith and belief you could probably light up. The Catholic Church and its orgainizations can without a doubt demonstrate that they have followed these principles as deeply held convictions for years. In addition, is there a benefit to having Catholic Hospitials, Catholic Charities and or Catholic Schools fail. Let's be realistic these organisations have done a great deal of good why pick this fight. There is no real upside for the administriation.
Penn Pfautz February 10, 2012 at 02:33 am
Before we get all excited, consider this:http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/02/09/1063198/-Employers-have-had-to-provide-birth-control-coverage-since-2000?detail=hide&via=blog_1
Apparently all that is really changing is that, coverage for birth control will now be without co-pay because its a preventive service and preventive services now incur no copay. For some years these institutions have been required to include contraceptives if they provide prescription plans. And they. And they haven't complained about it. So forgive me if I believe it's all political.
Barzillai February 10, 2012 at 02:42 am
After the Roman Catholic leadership got in so much trouble for irresponsible handling of reports of child abuse by their employees, I thought the bishops would be too embarrassed to attempt to assert moral authority about pretty much anything. The fact that, yet again, they are mishandling a labor issue,by attempting to subjugate their female employees frankly astounds me. And we're back to sex again. It's always about sex, bishops. Maybe you should guy a clue from that short line of men seeking to be celibate? You think? I'm disgusted by this, as one person called it, a tempest in a teapot. Let women have the insurance, and let them decide whether or not to purchase contraceptives. That's called Free Will. And, that's called the law. Get your noses out of people's bedrooms and your minds out of the gutter. Control your thermostats or train your dogs, but leave people alone.
Winston February 10, 2012 at 03:06 am
The daily kos? Wow talk about a credible news source! Penn this source is much more credible.....http://spongebob.nick.com/
Chica2ool February 10, 2012 at 03:14 am
Barzillai is right on target! After years of covering up for pedophile priests and not reporting them to the police, these bishops knowingly moved them from parish to parish. And allowed them to sexually abuse children. The leaders of the catholic church are the worst kind of hypocrites and need to be brought to justice.
Winston February 10, 2012 at 12:28 pm
Barz....gee there are more pedophiles and sex offenders working in our public schools -check the records more teachers arrested in NJ than priests.. But guys like you really dont care...do you?
Truthteller February 10, 2012 at 01:22 pm
Sorry Penn Pfautz and Barzillai but you are misinformed. There is a federal law ERISA which allowed an exemption from religious institutions. This mandate removes that exemption. Barzillia this is not about women's health or labor issues. The issue is can the government force a religious institution to provide a service that goes against their beliefs. The constitution protects religious freedom. There is no excuse for the church leaders who failed to protect innocent children from sex abuse, however, there are many in the church who are not guilty of these actions and their religious freedom matters. Your frustration with the acts of certain members of the church is justified but that does not change the issue of religious freedom. This is not a Catholic issue other religious institutions have stood up and said this is violates religious freedoms. Baptists Ministers, Orthodox Jews, and Muslim leaders have said this is wrong. Since when in this country did we just start accepting government mandates that affect freedoms. Even when a cause does not affect us directly if it is taking away someone's liberty we need to tell the government no you can't do that. Just like you can't legislate morality you should not legislate against someones right to their moral beliefs. While we all appreciate employers that provide healthcare when did it become an obligation? Better yet how did it become an obligation? I thought those were bargaining rights and choices. cont.....
Peggy Devlin Blazewicz February 10, 2012 at 01:47 pm
Catholic high school, early 70’s, a priest was enlightening our class about abstinence; sex for procreation only. Anyone who had sex for any other reason except to impregnate was sinning! I asked the priest how he expected two people in love to just sleep next to each other every night. He answered telling me couples needed to pray for strength. Is this realistic, or, is the church out of touch with human relationships? But let’s forget about sex!
The church forgets that birth control medicines are used to treat many other women’s health related issues. Women need to take care of their reproductive system whether or not they are sexually active.
Truthteller February 10, 2012 at 02:15 pm
cont... These were bargaining issues at one time employers used their health plans and other benefits to attract workers. We have gone from employers opting to provide insurance, to employers must provide insurance, to telling you what type of insurance to provide even if it violates your right to religious freedom. Do you see the problem yet? Going off topic here. The government never should have required companies to provide coverage. The government should have passed sensible regulation on the insurance providers.. Requiring providers to have national networks.and requiring all health insurance providers to be mutual companies and tort reform are three areas that could have been effective. In a mutual company profitability is limited and all excess profits are returned to the insured as a dividend or as a credit. Imagine how much money could have been saved if congress did not sell out to special interest on these matters. Government run healthcare are you kidding? A safety net for the needy yes beyond that the government has screwed this up enough. The evidence is clear ever since the government got involved the cost have exploded and workers have paid the price. Credit where credit is due two good pieces of legislation did actually come out from this in the last 20 years. The patient bill of rights and the elimination of preexisting conditions as a use for denial of coverage.
Truthteller February 10, 2012 at 03:21 pm
Peggy the priest was teaching high school students. Did you really think in the 1970's he was going to have a serious conversation with a teenage girl on the subject of intimacy. However, congratulations on remembering the early 70's JK. Women have the right to their choice of birth control and have free will to make their choices. The constitution guarantees those rights the same constitution guarantees the right to religious freedom. Can the government impose laws that compel or force a religious organization to provide access to services in violation of its beliefs? The answer is no. When you remove the smoke and mirrors and conversations about things that are not part of the debate such as whether or not 98% of Catholics use birth control or whether it is an assault on women's health you are left with the essential question . Can the government impose a law that compels or forces a religious institution to provide access to services that are in violation of their beliefs? The reason the United States exists today is because we once had a tyrannical government that tried to impose its will on the colonies. Does not matter whether you agree with the church or not a violation of the constitution is a violation of the constitution.
Captain Nemo February 10, 2012 at 06:58 pm
The church should be exempt only if they agree to pay for the costs associated with the entire pregnancy and the additional costs associated with raising a child to adulthood.
Jim Tobias February 10, 2012 at 07:45 pm
And I feel the same way about wages -- I refuse to pay my workers, knowing the awful things they would go ahead and buy. I could not live with myself.
Jim Tobias February 10, 2012 at 07:50 pm
I don't agree. If a hospital supported by a synagogue paid its workers in both cash and a credit at a supermarket, could they forbid the employees from buying pork there? It's up to the employee to determine their religious practice, not the employer. That's the freedom of religion we are guaranteed. These hospitals, etc., are not religious institutions themselves, they are just owned by religious institutions.
Jim Tobias February 10, 2012 at 07:58 pm
MoR: This law affects no religious institution at all. The hospitals, schools, etc. that are affected are public institutions receiving public money for non-religious services. The actual practices of Catholics are relevant here, because the Church is trying to get the government to enforce its unpopular edicts. Tell me, whose religious practices are being limited here? Not yours, not mine, not the most fervent Catholic on the face of the earth.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New Brunswick Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Laura Luc June 7, 2013 at 03:09 am
Join us for a TALK BACK with the Cast, Director Laura Luc and Choreographer Lane Napper, after theRead More opening performance at 11 AM on June 8th at George Street Playhouse! Buy tickets at http://freckleface-georgestplayhouse.bpt.me/